Ever looked at your exposures for a HDR and thought: "Not worth processing"? This happened to me with this one. I did it anyway and it surprised me and turned out to be one of my favourites! The sky was very cloudy that day, there was a huge shadow and therefore high contrasts, so I decided to try some exposures for a HDR. And the result shows quiet clearly what HDR can achieve when a single shot canīt show what your eyes saw... Iīll post the exposures of this one, too, and you will know what I mean.
Spot: Austria/Vorarlberg/Brandnertal/Kanzelköpfe/Gamsluggen (View to Switzerland). Want to see the other side, too? 3 Exposures (2step), tonemapped, handheld (I wouldnīt have dared to handle a tripod where I stood - had to handle myself)
the background is so amazing, it makes the picture so great even I don't find the front part interesting... but I could stare at the background like enchanted
Many thanks - I know what you mean! I think itīs the contrast between the soft green hills and mountains in the background and the rough and naked stones in the foreground that makes the pic work.
Many thanks, Greg! Yes, daylight-landscapes look better if you donīt exaggerate the HDR-effects. It damages the sky sometimes and causes halos round the mountains - thatīs what I learned so far...
You did a fine job with this! I haven't done any HDR myself, though I have experimented with blending two images (basically a digital version of a graduated neutral density filter). Perhaps one of these days...